At this year’s Powersports Finance Summit, I attended a panel discussion on state and federal compliance. One of the key takeaways was clear: trends in state enforcement in solar lending may increasingly impact powersports and auto lenders. The parallels in regulatory focus are becoming harder to ignore.
As state regulators turn a more critical eye toward solar lending, what begins on rooftops may soon cast a long shadow over vehicle finance. The enforcement trends taking shape in the solar sector provide a real-time warning signal for any lender whose borrower communications aren’t airtight.
And while federal enforcement may be slowing down, compliance obligations aren’t. It is important to stay aligned with compliance rules and regulations across the account life cycle - state and federal inquiries can “look back” at your compliance efforts when determining enforcement action. That means you could face liability for five or more years of infractions if enforcement priorities shift.
Across the country, regulators are raising concerns about how solar loans are sold, structured, and disclosed. Key findings from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and others include:
The CFPB’s 2024 report on solar lending emphasized that consumers often “are not provided with clear and accurate information about the terms of the loan or the obligations that follow.” This focus on transparency, disclosure, and borrower understanding is setting the tone for regulatory expectations across consumer finance sectors.
While solar financing and vehicle lending may seem unrelated, they share several structural features:
These examples mirror the issues emerging in solar lending and reinforce the message that regulators are looking closely at how terms are communicated and enforced.
Much of the regulatory risk in both solar and vehicle lending stems from one common area: borrower communication. Whether it's a marketing email, dealer communications during the sale, a loan origination package, or a default notice, inconsistencies in tone, timing, or terminology can create serious exposure.
Common breakdowns include:
These aren’t just operational missteps. In the eyes of regulators, they can constitute unfair or deceptive practices.
Proactive lenders should view the current solar lending scrutiny as a signal to review and reinforce their borrower communication strategies. Recommended steps include:
Regulatory scrutiny rarely stays confined to one sector. What we’re seeing in solar lending - confusing disclosures, pressure-driven sales, mismatched loan documentation - is already making its way into other areas of consumer finance.
Now is the time for lenders in auto, powersports, and related industries to assess how they manage borrower communications. Treat your letters, notices, and disclosures as strategic compliance assets, not just operational outputs.
If the heat is rising, don’t wait to get burned.
Are your borrower communications ready for regulator scrutiny?
Let’s talk about how to strengthen your templates, disclosures, and delivery workflows - before enforcement trends catch up with your business.
References & Further Reading
CFPB Issue Spotlight on Solar Financing (August 2024): https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_solar-financing-issue-spotlight_2024-08.pdf
CFPB Consumer Advisory on Solar Loans: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/consumer-advisory-steer-clear-of-costly-and-complex-loans-for-solar-energy-installation
CFPB Supervisory Highlights: Auto Finance Special Edition (Fall 2024): https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_supervisory-highlights-special-ed-auto-finance_2024-10.pdf